Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. The claim about Hamas stating "no point" to talks is difficult to verify directly with the provided sources, though one source mentions a Hamas official's view on talks (Verification Source #1). The claim about Israel's plan to seize Gaza indefinitely and control aid is also difficult to verify directly, but the UN's alarm suggests potential validity. There's a moderate bias due to selective reporting and potential omission of context.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Hamas says 'no point' to talks as Israel plans expanded Gaza offensive.
  • Verification Source #1: Mentions a Hamas official's view on resuming talks, but doesn't directly confirm the "no point" statement.
  • Verification Source #5: Mentions Israel's stance on attacks ceasing if militant rocket attacks stop.
• Verdict:* Partially verified. The general sentiment of Hamas being unwilling to talk under certain conditions is supported, but the exact quote is not directly verified.
• Claim:** The UN also expresses alarm after Israel approves a new plan that may include seizing all of Gaza indefinitely and controlling aid.
• Verdict:* Difficult to verify directly with the provided sources. None of the sources explicitly confirm Israel's plan to seize Gaza indefinitely. However, the UN's alarm suggests the existence of such a plan or concerns about it. This claim relies on the BBC's reporting of the UN's statement.
• Claim:** Israel plans expanded Gaza offensive.
  • Verification Source #1: Confirms Israel expands Gaza ground offensive.
• Verdict:* Verified.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: "Israel expands Gaza ground offensive, says efforts in south will be no less strength than in north/ Dec 3, 2023 ... Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan said resuming talks with Israel ... my point is that religion is part of the problem, not the solution." This supports the claim of an expanded offensive and provides context regarding Hamas's stance on talks, though it doesn't directly verify the "no point" quote.
• The lack of direct verification for the "seizing Gaza indefinitely" claim is a significant limitation. The UN's alarm, as reported by the BBC, is the primary support, but without further corroboration, the accuracy remains uncertain.