Harvey Weinstein prosecutors say defense's jury misconduct claims are 'implausible'
Harvey Weinstein prosecutors say defense's jury misconduct claims are 'implausible'
Prosecutors are urging a judge to reject Harvey Weinstein’s claims that his June sexual assault conviction was marred by threats and bullying among jurors
Read the full article on ABC Entertainment
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article appears factually accurate based on the provided sources. It reports on the prosecutors' response to Harvey Weinstein's defense claims of jury misconduct. The reporting seems neutral, presenting the core information without apparent bias.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: Prosecutors are urging a judge to reject Harvey Weinstein’s claims that his June sexual assault conviction was marred by threats and bullying among jurors
- Verification Source #5: Prosecutors are urging a judge to reject Harvey Weinstein's claims that his June sexual assault conviction was marred by threats and bullying among jurors.
- Assessment: Supported
- Claim: The Manhattan district attorney's office said the jurors' claims were “inconsistent and implausible” and that they provided no legal basis for
- Verification Source #1: The Manhattan district attorney's office said the jurors' claims were “inconsistent and implausible” and that they provided no legal basis for
- Verification Source #2: The Manhattan district attorney's office said the jurors' claims were “inconsistent and implausible” and that they provided no legal basis for
- Assessment: Supported
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Sources 1, 2, and 5 all support the claim that prosecutors are contesting the defense's claims of jury misconduct, stating they are 'inconsistent and implausible'.
- The title of the article is directly supported by the content snippets of sources 1, 2, 4, and 5.