How Britain's membership of the ECHR became a political hot potato
How Britain's membership of the ECHR became a political hot potato
The extent to which leaving the Convention would make a difference to immigration has been greatly exaggerated, argues Lord Sumption
Read the full article on BBC Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article's factual accuracy is mixed. While the central theme of the ECHR being a 'political hot potato' is supported, specific claims about the impact on immigration require further scrutiny. The article exhibits moderate bias through selective reporting and framing of the issue.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: Britain's membership of the ECHR became a political hot potato
- Verification Source #1: The phrase 'political hot potato' is used in relation to political and judicial members.
- Verification Source #3: The phrase 'political hot potato' is used in relation to the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Verification Source #4: The issue of UN accountability has long been regarded as a political hot potato.
- Verification Source #5: The phrase 'political hot potato' is used in relation to Brexit.
- Assessment: Supported. Multiple sources use the phrase 'political hot potato' in similar contexts.
- Claim: The extent to which leaving the Convention would make a difference to immigration has been greatly exaggerated, argues Lord Sumption
- Assessment: Unverified. The provided sources do not directly address Lord Sumption's argument or the exaggeration of immigration impact. This claim relies on the article's reporting of Lord Sumption's view.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Source 3 supports the claim that the European Convention on Human Rights is a 'political hot potato'.
- The article's claim about Lord Sumption's argument regarding immigration is unverified by the provided sources.