Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the provided snippets, with the main claims about winning Eurovision being supported. There's a slight bias towards entertainment and a simplified view of the competition. The "no key changes" comment might be subjective.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "It pays to be spectacular, inspiring and just weird enough." `Verification Source #3:` supports this claim.
• Claim:** "But, please: no key changes." This is more of an opinion or observation about a common Eurovision trope. It's not a factual claim that can be definitively verified.
• Claim:** "Sing about personal liberation." `Verification Source #1:` supports this claim.
• Claim:** "Sing in English." `Verification Source #1:` supports this claim.
• Claim:** "Allude to folk music. (But don't send a folk song.)." `Verification Source #1:` supports this claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• `Verification Source #1:` lists several "easy steps" to winning Eurovision, including singing about personal liberation, singing in English, and alluding to folk music.
• `Verification Source #3:` mentions that "It pays to be spectacular, inspiring..." which supports the article's initial statement.
• `Verification Source #2:` mentions "eurovision-in-7-easy-steps.html" which confirms the existence of the article and its topic.
• The claim about "no key changes" is not explicitly supported or contradicted by any of the sources. It's more of an observation or opinion.