Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. The claim that Maduro is asking Venezuelans to vote again is plausible, given the context of previous elections and political instability. However, the characterization of the previous election as "tainted" introduces bias. The snippet provided focuses on the opposition's dilemma, which is verifiable in principle, but the specific claims within the snippet are not directly verifiable with the provided sources.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Maduro asks Venezuelans to vote again. This claim is indirectly supported by Verification Source #1, which mentions "Maduro asks Venezuelans to vote again" in its title.
• Claim:** The previous election was "tainted." This is a subjective characterization. While Verification Source #2 mentions the EU acting as an election observer and the Maduro regime asking them to leave, it doesn't explicitly state the election was "tainted." Verification Source #3 mentions "Venezuela's election was stolen," which supports the "tainted" characterization, but it is an opinion piece.
• Claim:** Some in the opposition say the only way to protest is to abstain. This claim is not directly verifiable with the provided sources.
• Claim:** Others say doing so will let the government “say they won without resistance.” This claim is not directly verifiable with the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Verification Source #1 confirms that Maduro is asking Venezuelans to vote again.
• Agreement:** Verification Source #3 supports the idea that the previous election was not legitimate.
• Lack of Coverage:** The provided sources do not directly cover the specific claims about the opposition's views on abstaining from the election.
• Internal Knowledge:** It is common knowledge that Venezuelan elections under Maduro have been controversial and subject to allegations of fraud. However, this internal knowledge is not used to verify specific claims due to the availability of sources.