Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, reporting on the incident involving a Florida school resource officer. The claims regarding the officer's actions, charges, and suspension are likely accurate, though specific details like the officer's age and the school's specific focus on special needs are not explicitly verified by the provided sources. The language used, such as "shocking video" and "manhandling," introduces a degree of bias.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** A Florida sheriff’s deputy is out of jail on bond after a shocking video showed him slamming a teenage girl to the ground. This claim is generally supported by the context of the provided sources, which discuss excessive force by school resource officers (SROs) (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4). However, none of the sources directly confirm this specific incident.
• Claim:** Surveillance footage caught the 38-year-old resource officer Willard Miller manhandling the 15-year-old at a school for children with special needs. This claim is partially verifiable. The sources discuss excessive force by SROs, but do not confirm the specific details of this incident, such as the officer's age, name, the student's age, or the school's specific focus on special needs.
• Claim:** He’s charged with one count of felony child abuse without great bodily harm and is suspended without pay. This claim is not directly verified by the provided sources. The sources discuss excessive force and legal consequences for SROs (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4), but do not confirm the specific charges or suspension in this case.
• Bias:** The use of terms like "shocking video" and "manhandling" suggests a negative bias against the officer.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1, #2, #3, and #4 all discuss the issue of excessive force by school resource officers, supporting the general context of the article.
• Verification Source #2 mentions "recent incidents around the country involving police mistreatment of young children," which aligns with the article's focus.
• None of the provided sources directly confirm the specific details of the incident, such as the officer's name, age, the specific charges, or the school's focus on special needs. This lack of specific verification limits the factual accuracy score.
• Verification Source #5 expresses anger at a police officer's "blatant use of excessive force," reflecting a similar sentiment to the article's tone.