Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. The claim about the ceasefire agreement and U.S. involvement is supported by multiple sources. However, the specific claim about "100 militants" killed is unverified by the provided sources. The article exhibits moderate bias through potentially selective reporting, focusing on the Indian perspective without readily available Pakistani counter-claims in the provided sources.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** India and Pakistan ceasefire shaken by clashes in Kashmir after U.S.-led deal.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5: Support the claim of a ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan after U.S.-led talks. They also support the claim that the ceasefire was shaken by clashes.
• Claim:** India says its strikes into Pakistan-administered Kashmir and Pakistan on Wednesday killed more than 100 militants.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5: None of these sources confirm the specific number of militants killed (more than 100). This claim is unverified.
• Claim:** The deal was confirmed on Saturday, May 10.
  • Verification Source #1, #3, #4, #5: Support the claim that the ceasefire was agreed upon on Saturday, May 10.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** All sources (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5) agree that a ceasefire agreement was reached between India and Pakistan following U.S.-led talks.
• Lack of Coverage:** None of the provided sources confirm the specific claim that India's strikes killed "more than 100 militants" (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5). This lack of verification impacts the factual accuracy score.
• Potential Bias:** The article primarily presents the Indian perspective. Without corroborating information from Pakistani sources (not provided), it's difficult to assess the full context and potential bias in the reporting of the clashes.