Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While the core claim of an academic being arrested for anti-war posts on Instagram is plausible, the provided sources don't directly confirm the specific incident in India. The sources touch on related topics like anti-war protests and arrests in other countries, and a similar case in Russia, but fail to verify the specifics of the NY Times article. This suggests potential selective reporting or lack of comprehensive verification.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** India Arrests an Academic for Antiwar Posts on Instagram.
  • Verification Source #1, #2: These sources detail the arrest of a Russian student for anti-war posts on Instagram, *failing to cover* the specific claim about India.
  • Verification Source #3: This source mentions an Indian professor arrested over a social media post, but refers to "military operation" and doesn't explicitly mention "anti-war" posts or Instagram. It also appears to be an Instagram post itself, not a news article.
  • Verification Source #4: This source discusses anti-war protests and arrests in the US, *failing to cover* the claim about India.
  • Verification Source #5: This source is an Instagram page for an anti-war committee, *failing to cover* the claim about India.
• Claim:** The arrest of a political science professor and other incidents show Indian leaders’ sensitivity to the political fallout from the military flare-up.
• This is an interpretive claim. The provided sources don't directly support or contradict this interpretation. It's plausible, given the information about arrests for anti-war sentiment in other countries (Verification Source #1, #2), but without direct evidence of the specific incident in India, it's difficult to verify.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1 and #2: Provide evidence of arrests for anti-war posts on social media in Russia, showing a pattern of governments cracking down on dissent related to military actions. This lends some plausibility to the claim in the NY Times article, but doesn't confirm it.
• Verification Source #3: Provides some support for arrests related to social media posts in India, but the context is slightly different ("military operation" rather than explicitly "anti-war").
• The lack of direct confirmation from the provided sources regarding the specific incident in India raises concerns about the article's accuracy. The other sources focus on different countries and contexts.