Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the provided sources. The main claim that investigators don't know who leaked the Wisconsin Supreme Court draft abortion order is supported. There's no apparent bias in the reporting.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Investigators have concluded that the leak of a Wisconsin Supreme Court abortion order last year was likely deliberate, but they were unable to determine who was responsible.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the claim that investigators don't know who leaked the order.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the claim that investigators don't know who leaked the order.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports the claim that investigators don't know who leaked the order.
• Claim:** The June leak of a draft order showed the court would take a case brought by Planned Parenthood, which is seeking to declare access to abortion.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim.
• Claim:** Chief Justice Annette Ziegler called for a police investigation into the 'ostensibly leaked' draft order.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1, #3, and #5 all agree that investigators don't know who leaked the Wisconsin Supreme Court draft abortion order.
• Verification Source #1 and #2 agree that the leak involved a draft order related to a case brought by Planned Parenthood concerning abortion access.
• Verification Source #2 confirms that Chief Justice Ziegler called for an investigation.
• There are no contradictions among the provided sources.
• Verification Source #4 and #5 are irrelevant to the topic.