Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. The claim about expanding Gaza operations is plausible given the context of the conflict and supported by one source, but the broader claim of capturing "entire Palestinian territory" is less substantiated and potentially hyperbolic. The article exhibits moderate bias through its framing and potentially inflammatory language.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Israel plans to expand Gaza war to capture entire Palestinian territory."
  • Verification Source #4: Supports the idea of Israel occupying Gaza, which could be interpreted as an expansion of the war.
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions Israel occupied territories (Gaza) in the 1967 war.
  • Verification Source #1: Mentions Israel's policy of expanding illegal settlements on occupied Palestinian land.
  • Verification Source #3: States Israel gained control of the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1967.
• The claim of capturing the "entire Palestinian territory" is a broad statement. While Israel has occupied Palestinian territories in the past and present (Verification Source #2, #3, #1), the article's claim suggests a future plan for complete capture, which is not definitively supported by the provided sources.
• Claim:** "A Houthi missile struck Ben-Gurion airport Sunday for the first time since the war began, briefly closing it just as Israel voted to expand Gaza operations."
• None of the provided sources directly confirm or deny the Houthi missile strike on Ben-Gurion airport. This claim is *not covered* by the provided sources.
• Verification Source #4: Supports the idea of Israel expanding Gaza operations.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #4: "Occupying Gaza and establishing military rule there would go beyond Israel's stated war goals to end Hamas rule and free hostages captured…" This supports the idea of expanded operations.
• The lack of confirmation regarding the Houthi missile strike raises concerns about the article's overall reliability.
• The phrase "capture entire Palestinian territory" is not directly supported by the provided sources and could be considered an exaggeration or misinterpretation of potential Israeli actions.