Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, with the central claim of Israeli military strikes near Beirut targeting Hezbollah being supported by multiple sources. However, the article's suggestion that the cease-fire is in jeopardy is not directly addressed by the provided sources, and the phrasing could be interpreted as slightly biased. The article relies on the Israeli perspective, which could introduce a slant.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Israeli Military Strikes Near Beirut, Saying Hezbollah Was the Target.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the claim that Israel launched airstrikes on Beirut targeting Hezbollah.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that Israel conducted a strike in Beirut targeting Hezbollah.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the claim of Israeli air strikes in Beirut.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports the claim that senior Hezbollah commanders were the target of a strike in Beirut.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports the claim that Israel has hit Hezbollah targets across Lebanon.
• Claim:** The attack raised concerns that the cease-fire that ended a war between Israeli and Lebanese militants might be in jeopardy.
• Fail to cover:* None of the provided sources directly address the impact of the strikes on a cease-fire agreement. This claim is not verifiable with the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** All provided sources (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5) agree that Israel conducted strikes in or near Beirut, and that Hezbollah was the target.
• Lack of Coverage:** None of the provided sources discuss the impact of the strikes on a cease-fire agreement. The claim that the attack raised concerns about the cease-fire is not verifiable with the provided sources.