Analysis Summary:

The article makes a claim about the number of creators earning regular income on Patreon. This number is potentially verifiable, but the provided sources offer conflicting viewpoints on the platform's viability as a primary income source. The article leans towards a positive portrayal of Patreon, which introduces a moderate bias.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Today, 12 years after the introduction of Patreon, the company says it's a source of regular income for more than 300,000 artists, musicians, podcasters and other creators."
  • Verification Source #2: This source, the Patreon website, positions Patreon as a place to "turn your passion into a lasting creative business," which supports the idea of regular income.
  • Verification Source #5: This source, "The Outline," contradicts the claim, stating "No one makes a living on Patreon." This suggests that while some may earn *some* income, it's not a *living* for most.
  • Verification Source #1, #3, and #4: These sources discuss the challenges and realities of earning money on Patreon, including the difficulty of attracting patrons and the variability of income. They do not directly confirm or deny the 300,000 figure, but they cast doubt on the idea that it's a "regular income" for all.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #2: Supports the idea of Patreon as a platform for building a creative business.
• Verification Source #5: Directly contradicts the idea that people make a living on Patreon.
• Verification Source #1, #3, and #4: Highlight the difficulties and uncertainties of earning a substantial income on Patreon.
• The provided sources do not offer a definitive verification of the "300,000" figure. This number likely comes directly from Patreon, which has a vested interest in portraying itself positively.