Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the provided sources, which primarily confirm the title and general topic. The core claim about the cosmetic surgery boom in China and the factors driving it (face-scanning apps, social media, beauty standards) are supported. However, the extent of the boom and the specific impact of each factor are not verifiable with the provided sources, leading to a moderate bias due to potential selective reporting.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "I've had 100 operations and will never stop' - inside China's cosmetic surgery boom."
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: All sources confirm this as the title of the article, indicating the article focuses on the cosmetic surgery boom in China and features someone who has undergone a significant number of procedures.
• Claim:** "Face-scanning apps, social media influencers and toxic beauty standards are fuelling China's cosmetic surgery boom."
  • Verification Source #1, #2, and #3: These sources explicitly mention face-scanning apps, social media influencers, and toxic beauty standards as factors contributing to the cosmetic surgery boom in China.
• Claim:** (Implied) The article will provide an inside look at the cosmetic surgery boom in China.
  • Verification Source #1: The snippet mentions "Sitting in front of a mirror inside her luxury duplex apartment in Beijing, she gently dabs concealer onto bruises from a recent face-slimming…" This suggests the article includes personal stories and observations, supporting the "inside look" claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The title and the snippet provided in Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 consistently point to the article's focus on the cosmetic surgery boom in China.
• Verification Source #1, #2, and #3 support the claim that face-scanning apps, social media influencers, and toxic beauty standards are contributing factors.
• None of the sources contradict the claims. However, they do not provide specific data or statistics to quantify the extent of the boom or the precise impact of each contributing factor. This lack of specific, verifiable data contributes to the potential for bias through selective reporting.