Judge rules Google can keep Chrome, but must share some search engine data
Judge rules Google can keep Chrome, but must share some search engine data
The judge rejected the Justice Department’s effort to force Google to sell its popular Chrome browser, concluding the request was a bridge too far.
Read the full article on CBS Money
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article is mostly accurate, reporting on the judge's decision regarding Google and Chrome. The article presents the information in a straightforward manner with minimal apparent bias. However, the snippet is very short and lacks depth.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: The judge rejected the Justice Department's effort to force Google to sell its popular Chrome browser.
- Verification Source #1: This source indicates the DOJ proposed Google sell Chrome as an antitrust remedy.
- Verification Source #4: This source mentions a federal judge ruled that Google had monopolized the search market.
- Assessment: Supported. While the snippet doesn't explicitly state the judge's reasoning, the claim that the judge rejected the DOJ's effort is supported by the implication in source 1 that the DOJ wanted Google to sell Chrome, and source 4 which discusses the antitrust case.
- Claim: Google must share some search engine data.
- Verification Source #1: Source 1 mentions requiring Google to license data to other search engines.
- Assessment: Supported. Source 1 supports the claim that Google may be required to share data.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Source 1: Google must sell Chrome, DOJ to propose as antitrust remedy ... Requiring Google to license the data to other search engine