Judge strikes down Ohio law limiting kids' use of social media as unconstitutional

Judge strikes down Ohio law limiting kids' use of social media as unconstitutional

A federal judge has permanently struck down an Ohio law that would have required children and teens under 16 to get parental consent to use social media apps

Truth Analysis

Factual Accuracy
5/5
Bias Level
5/5

Analysis Summary:

The article is factually accurate. It correctly reports that a federal judge struck down an Ohio law requiring parental consent for minors to use social media. The provided sources corroborate the article's claim.

Detailed Analysis:

  • Claim: A federal judge has permanently struck down an Ohio law that would have required children and teens under 16 to get parental consent to use social media apps.
    • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim.
    • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim.
    • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim.
    • Verification Source #4: Supports this claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

  • Verification Source #1: "Judge strikes down Ohio law requiring parental permission for kids to get social media accounts."
  • Verification Source #2: "An Ohio law requiring that people under age 16 get parental permission to use social media is unconstitutional, a federal judge held this week."
  • Verification Source #3: "A law requiring social media and gaming sites to get parental permission before letting any Ohioan younger than 16 on can't go into effect..."
  • Verification Source #4: "Judge strikes down Ohio law that would have required age verification on social media." It also mentions NetChoice filed the lawsuit claiming the law was unconstitutional.
  • Verification Source #5: Does not cover the claim.