Judge Strikes Down Trump Order Targeting WilmerHale Law Firm
Judge Strikes Down Trump Order Targeting WilmerHale Law Firm
The judge concluded that the firm was targeted over its association with Robert S. Mueller III, and that the order “must be struck down in its entirety.”
Read the full article on NY Times Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article is mostly accurate, with the central claim of a judge striking down an order targeting WilmerHale supported by multiple sources. However, the reason for the targeting, specifically the connection to Robert Mueller III, is not explicitly confirmed by all sources, introducing a potential slant. The article appears to present the information in a straightforward manner, but the selection of details could reflect a moderate bias.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: Judge strikes down Trump order targeting WilmerHale Law Firm.
- Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that a judge blocked Trump's executive order targeting WilmerHale.
- Verification Source #4: Supports the claim that WilmerHale sued President Trump over executive orders targeting the firm.
- Verification Source #5: Supports the claim that a judge blocked Trump's executive order targeting WilmerHale.
- Claim: The firm was targeted over its association with Robert S. Mueller III.
- This claim is not explicitly supported by Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, or #5. While the sources confirm the targeting of law firms, the specific reason of association with Robert Mueller III is not mentioned.
- *Internal Knowledge:* While I cannot confirm this claim with the provided sources, it is plausible that the firm's association with Robert Mueller III could be a contributing factor. However, without direct confirmation, this remains unverified.
- Claim: The order “must be struck down in its entirety.”
- Verification Source #1: Mentions law firms asking judges to permanently block executive orders and for rulings to strike them down in their entirety. This supports the potential outcome.
- Verification Source #2: States that judges *partially* blocked the executive orders, which contradicts the claim that it *must* be struck down in its entirety.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Agreement: Verification Source #2, #4, and #5 all confirm that WilmerHale was targeted by Trump's executive orders and that judges intervened.
- Contradiction: Verification Source #2 states that judges *partially* blocked the executive orders, while the article claims the order "must be struck down in its entirety." This suggests a potential overstatement in the article.
- Lack of Coverage: None of the provided sources explicitly confirm that the targeting of WilmerHale was *specifically* due to its association with Robert S. Mueller III. Verification Source #3 mentions Perkins Coie was targeted over Clinton campaign and diversity policies, suggesting other reasons for targeting law firms.