Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate, reporting on the potential jeopardy of a Democratic debate due to a labor dispute and the candidates' pledge to boycott. The bias is moderate, stemming from the framing of the situation and potentially selective reporting, though this is difficult to ascertain fully with the limited context. The core claim about the debate being in jeopardy and the candidates' boycott is supported by the available information.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** The sixth Democratic presidential debate, set to be held in Los Angeles this week, may not be held.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the claim that the debate was scheduled for December 17, 2019, and mentions Democratic leaders pushing for an end to the labor dispute, implying the debate was in jeopardy.
• Claim:** On Sunday, all seven candidates scheduled to appear pledged to boycott the debate in support of workers at the site.
• This claim is not directly confirmed or denied by the provided sources. However, Verification Source #1 mentions "Democratic leaders push for end to labor dispute ahead of," which indirectly supports the idea that the candidates were involved in the dispute.
• Overall:** The article presents a situation where a labor dispute is threatening a Democratic debate and candidates are showing solidarity with the workers. The provided sources offer some support, but a more direct confirmation of the boycott pledge would increase the factual accuracy score.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: "Democratic leaders push for end to labor dispute ahead of…" This supports the idea that a labor dispute was indeed threatening the debate.
• The lack of direct confirmation of the candidates' boycott pledge is a limitation. Without further sources, it's difficult to definitively confirm this aspect of the report.
• The other sources (Verification Source #2, #3, #4, #5) are irrelevant to the claims made in the article.