Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate, reflecting the reported tensions within the Labour party following local election results. The headline claim is supported by the general sentiment reflected in the provided sources, although none directly confirm "rage" specifically. There's a moderate bias due to the focus on negative sentiment and potential selective reporting.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Anger over the party's drubbing in last week's local elections has not dissipated over the weekend."
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the idea of tensions and upset within Labour, although related to a different issue (winter fuel cut) and time (September 2024).
  • Verification Source #5: Supports the idea of anger and rebellion within the Labour party, although related to a different issue (abstention vote) and time (September 2024).
• Fail to cover:* The specific claim about "last week's local elections" is not directly addressed by the provided sources. However, the general sentiment of internal conflict within the Labour party is supported.
• Internal Knowledge:* It is plausible that local election results would cause internal tensions within a political party.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: "Many Labour MPs, whose email inboxes have been deluged by worried and angry constituents in the days running up to the vote, have been upset…" This shows evidence of upset within the Labour party, although related to a different issue.
• Verification Source #5: "Abstention is the new rebellion" says one anonymous Labour MP. Describing the vote as "a key test" of Sir Keir Starmer's authority, the Times…" This shows evidence of internal rebellion and testing of authority within the Labour party, although related to a different issue.
• Lack of Coverage:* None of the sources directly confirm the specific claim about "last week's local elections" causing anger that "has not dissipated over the weekend." This is a limitation.