Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the provided sources, with the primary claim about the clinic closure and the rarity of late-term abortions being supported. However, the framing of the title and the selection of information suggest a moderate bias in favor of abortion access. Some claims, particularly regarding the reasons for late-term abortions, are not directly verifiable with the provided sources, requiring reliance on internal knowledge.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** "An abortion clinic in Colorado that for more than 50 years served people who looked to terminate their pregnancies in the second or third trimester quietly closed last month."
• Verification Source #1, #2, #3, and #4: All support this claim, indicating the clinic's closure and its focus on later-term abortions.
• Claim 2:** "Late abortions are rare."
• Verification Source #1, #2, #3, and #4: The titles of these articles all state this claim. While the exact statistical rarity isn't provided in these snippets, the consistent assertion supports the claim. Verification Source #5 provides general data on abortion trends but doesn't specifically quantify "late" abortions.
• Implicit Claim:** The closure of the clinic is a significant loss.
• This is an interpretation rather than a direct factual claim. The title's phrasing ("The US just lost a clinic...") implies a negative consequence. This is not directly verifiable but represents a potential bias.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1, #2, #3, and #4: All agree on the closure of the clinic in Colorado that offered later-term abortions for over 50 years.
• Verification Source #1, #2, #3, and #4: All agree that late-term abortions are rare.
• Verification Source #5: Provides general context about abortion rates in the US but doesn't directly address the specific claims about the Colorado clinic or the rarity of late-term abortions.
• There are no direct contradictions among the provided sources.