Analysis Summary:

The accuracy of the article is questionable due to the lack of external verification sources. The claim that transferring FEMA funds will have "no impact" on hurricane response is highly suspect and likely an oversimplification, given the nature of resource allocation. The article exhibits moderate bias by presenting McAleenan's statement without immediate counter-arguments or critical analysis.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** McAleenan says transfer of FEMA funds to border will have "no impact" on hurricane response.
• Verification Source #N/A: This is the central claim. Without external sources, I must rely on general knowledge. It is *highly unlikely* that transferring funds from FEMA, an agency responsible for disaster relief, would have *no impact* on its ability to respond to hurricanes. Resource allocation is a zero-sum game to some extent. This claim is therefore suspect.
• Claim 2:** Homeland Security Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan joins Margaret Brennan to discuss how FEMA is preparing for the arrival of Hurricane Dorian.
• Verification Source #N/A: This is a statement of fact about the interview's context. Without external sources, I cannot verify the specific details of the interview. However, it is plausible given the timing and the roles of the individuals involved.
• Implicit Claim:** The interview presents McAleenan's perspective without immediate challenge or alternative viewpoints.
• Verification Source #N/A: Based on the snippet, the article seems to present McAleenan's statement without immediate counter-arguments. This suggests a potential bias towards his perspective.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #N/A: *Internal Knowledge:* Common sense and general understanding of government budgeting and disaster relief operations suggest that transferring funds from FEMA would likely have some impact, even if minimized or mitigated. The claim of "no impact" is highly improbable.
• Verification Source #N/A: *Lack of Coverage:* The snippet does not provide any supporting evidence for McAleenan's claim. It also lacks alternative viewpoints or critical analysis.
• Verification Source #N/A: *Lack of Coverage:* The snippet does not provide any information about the size of the transfer, the specific programs affected, or the mitigation strategies in place to minimize the impact. This lack of context makes it difficult to assess the accuracy of the claim.