Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is mixed. While it states the police force acknowledges it cannot legally stop the protest, the context surrounding the "shock" of the Met chief and the nature of Palestine Action's activities require further scrutiny. The provided sources do not directly address the specifics of this protest, making a comprehensive verification difficult. There's a moderate bias due to the framing of the Met chief's reaction as "shocked," which could influence the reader's perception.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Met chief 'shocked' by planned Palestine Action protest.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: *Fail to cover* this specific claim. The sources discuss unrelated topics such as Trump's plans for Gaza, the 9/11 Commission Report, college protests, and the Nuremberg trials.
  • Internal Knowledge: Without further context or sources, it's impossible to verify the Met chief's emotional state or the reasons for it. The word "shocked" introduces a degree of bias.
• Claim:** The force says it cannot legally stop Monday's protest in support of the pro-Palestine group.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: *Fail to cover* this specific claim.
  • Internal Knowledge: This statement is plausible given the right to protest in many democratic societies, but without further information about the specific legal basis or restrictions, it remains unverified by the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not offer any direct support or contradiction for the claims made in the article.
• The lack of coverage from the provided sources limits the ability to assess the factual accuracy and bias definitively.
• The use of the word "shocked" without further context introduces a potential bias, as it frames the Met chief's reaction in a specific way.