Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the provided sources. The main claims regarding local inquiries and the Conservative party's response are supported. There is a slight bias evident in the selective reporting of the Conservative's viewpoint, potentially omitting the full context of their argument.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** More local grooming inquires expected - minister.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, stating Home Office minister Jess Phillips expects local inquiries into grooming gangs will "go further" than the five already announced.
• Claim:** The Conservatives said the local reviews would "not do" and repeated calls for a national investigation.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports the claim that the government has been facing pressure to launch a new national inquiry.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that Jess Phillips argued that locally led enquiries were more effective. This suggests a disagreement between the Conservatives and the minister.
• Claim:** (Implied) The government is pursuing local inquiries.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports this claim, stating Downing Street will "set out further details" about the five local inquiries.
  • Verification Source #5: Confirms Yvette Cooper announced a plan for government-backed local grooming gangs inquiries.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: "Home Office minister Jess Phillips said she expects local inquiries into grooming gangs will “go further” than the five already announced." This supports the claim that more local inquiries are expected.
• Verification Source #5: "The government has been facing pressure to launch a new national inquiry into grooming gangs but ministers have said one was already carried..." This supports the claim that the Conservatives are calling for a national investigation and that the government is resisting.
• Verification Source #2: "The request was turned down in October by safeguarding minister Jess Phillips, who argued that locally led enquiries were more effective at..." This provides context for the Conservative's opposition, suggesting a difference in opinion regarding the best approach.
• The article's brevity and focus on the Conservative's reaction, without providing their full reasoning or the government's counter-arguments in detail, suggests a slight bias. The article could be more balanced by including more context.