Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While the claim about her involvement in dangerous missions during WWII is plausible given the context, it's not directly verifiable with the provided sources. The claim about founding a girls' school in Ivory Coast is also not verifiable with the provided sources. The article appears to be minimally biased, presenting the information in a straightforward manner.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** During World War II, she deceived her watchful mother so she could take part in dangerous missions.
  • Verification Source #1: Does not directly cover this claim, but discusses female involvement in France during the Liberation.
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions "during world" but doesn't provide specific details about Odile de Vasselot or her activities.
  • Verification Source #3: Does not cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #4: Does not cover this claim.
• Verdict:* Not verifiable with provided sources. Plausible given the historical context of the French Resistance, but requires external verification.
• Claim:** Later, she founded a girls’ school in Ivory Coast.
  • Verification Source #1: Does not cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions "school" and "later" but doesn't provide specific details about Odile de Vasselot or her activities in Ivory Coast.
  • Verification Source #3: Does not cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #4: Does not cover this claim.
• Verdict:* Not verifiable with provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not offer direct support or contradiction for the claims made in the article snippet.
• Verification Source #1: Provides context about female roles during the Liberation of France, which makes the claim about her involvement in dangerous missions *plausible*, but doesn't confirm it.
• Verification Source #2: Mentions "school" and "later" but doesn't provide specific details about Odile de Vasselot or her activities in Ivory Coast.