Open: This is "Face the Nation," January 26
Open: This is "Face the Nation," January 26

Today on “Face the Nation, House Democrats wrap up their case against President Trump and the White House legal team promises a vigorous defense. Will there be enough support to bring in witnesses?
Read the full article on CBS Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article snippet is mostly accurate in its description of the "Face the Nation" episode. It accurately reflects the focus on the House Democrats' case against President Trump and the White House's defense. There is a slight bias towards neutrality, presenting both sides of the issue.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim:** House Democrats wrap up their case against President Trump.
- Verification Source #4: Mentions "Face the Nation" and media coverage, but doesn't specifically confirm the Democrats wrapping up their case against Trump. Fails to cover.
- Internal Knowledge: Based on general knowledge of impeachment proceedings, this is a plausible scenario for a "Face the Nation" episode.
- Claim:** The White House legal team promises a vigorous defense.
- Verification Source #4: Mentions "Face the Nation" and media coverage, but doesn't specifically confirm the White House promising a vigorous defense. Fails to cover.
- Internal Knowledge: Given the context of an impeachment trial, it is reasonable to expect the White House legal team to promise a vigorous defense.
- Claim:** Will there be enough support to bring in witnesses?
- Verification Source #4: Mentions "Face the Nation" and media coverage, but doesn't specifically confirm the question of witness support. Fails to cover.
- Internal Knowledge: The question of witnesses is a common element in impeachment trials.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Verification Source #4: Provides evidence that "Face the Nation" is a program that receives media coverage.
- Lack of Coverage: The provided sources do not directly confirm the specific claims about the content of the "Face the Nation" episode regarding the impeachment trial. Internal knowledge suggests these claims are plausible within the context of such a trial.