Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is mixed. The claim about OpenAI and Microsoft funding teacher training is plausible given their investment in AI, but the specific details, such as the $23 million figure and Anthropic's contribution, are not directly verifiable with the provided sources. The article exhibits moderate bias by focusing on the positive aspects of AI training for teachers without addressing potential drawbacks or criticisms.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** OpenAI and Microsoft bankroll new A.I. Training for Teachers.
  • Verification Source #2 and #5: Support the general idea of Microsoft and OpenAI supporting AI training initiatives through "unrestricted gifts" to libraries.
  • Verification Source #1: Mentions Microsoft's investment in OpenAI.
• Verdict:* Partially supported. The general idea is supported, but the specific context of teacher training is not directly confirmed.
• Claim:** The American Federation of Teachers would use $23 million to create a national training center.
  • Verification Source #None: This specific claim is not covered by any of the provided sources.
• Verdict:* Unverified.
• Claim:** $500,000 from the A.I. start-up Anthropic.
  • Verification Source #None: This specific claim is not covered by any of the provided sources.
• Verdict:* Unverified.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #2 and #5: "Supported by ''unrestricted gifts'' from Microsoft and ChatGPT maker OpenAI..." This supports the general idea of OpenAI and Microsoft funding AI-related initiatives.
• Verification Source #1: "This figure includes the $3 billion spent on training new models and $2 billion on running them." This shows the scale of investment in AI training, making the claim of funding for teacher training plausible.
• The lack of coverage for the specific dollar amounts and Anthropic's involvement makes it difficult to assess the complete accuracy of the article.