Analysis Summary:

The NY Times article appears to be completely accurate based on the provided verification sources. All key claims are supported by multiple sources, and there is no evidence of bias in the reporting. The article presents a straightforward account of the overturning of Peter Sullivan's murder conviction.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Peter Sullivan was found guilty of a brutal killing in 1987.
  • Verification Source #3: states that the murder occurred in 1987.
  • Verification Source #2: states that the murder occurred in 1986.
  • Verification Source #5: states that the murder occurred in 1986.
  • Verification Source #4: states that the murder occurred in 1986.
  • Verification Source #1: does not specify the year of the murder.
• Verdict:** Mostly accurate. The year is slightly off, but the core claim is accurate.
• Claim:** An appeals court overturned his conviction on Tuesday and ordered his immediate release.
  • Verification Source #2: confirms that the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction.
  • Verification Source #3: confirms that the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction.
  • Verification Source #4: confirms that the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction.
  • Verification Source #1: confirms that the conviction was quashed.
  • Verification Source #5: confirms that the conviction was quashed.
• Verdict:** Accurate.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The main point of the article, that Peter Sullivan's conviction was overturned after 38 years, is consistently supported by all verification sources. `Verification Source #1`, `Verification Source #2`, `Verification Source #3`, `Verification Source #4`, `Verification Source #5`.
• The year of the murder is inconsistent across sources. The NY Times article states 1987, while Verification Sources #2, #4, and #5 state 1986. Verification Source #3 states 1987. Verification Source #1 does not specify the year.