Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, with the core claim of a school shooting in Austria resulting in 10 deaths being widely supported. The article mentions an investigation into how the shooter passed a psychological test, which is a reasonable inference given the circumstances, but not explicitly confirmed by the provided sources. The article appears relatively neutral in its reporting.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Gunman killed 10 at Austrian School.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports, stating "Austria has held a minute of silence for 10 people killed in a school shooting..."
  • Verification Source #2: Supports, stating "Former pupil kills 10 people and himself in shooting at Austrian school" and "Graz Hospital later confirmed the death of a 10th person."
  • Verification Source #5: Supports, stating "Austria reels from 'national tragedy' after gunman kills 10 at former..."
  • Verification Source #3: Contradicts slightly, stating "Eleven people have died following a shooting at a secondary school in the Austrian city of Graz. A 10th victim has died in hospital..." This suggests the shooter is included in the 11.
  • Verification Source #4: Contradicts slightly, stating "Gunman kills 9 in Austria school shooting..." This is an earlier report, and the death toll later rose.
• Claim:** Officials were investigating how an apparently troubled man had passed the psychological test required to buy firearms.
• No provided source explicitly confirms this investigation. However, it is a logical step following such an event. This is an inference, and while plausible, it is not directly verifiable with the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The core claim of 10 deaths is supported by Verification Sources #1, #2, and #5. Verification Source #3 mentions 11 deaths, which likely includes the shooter. Verification Source #4 initially reported 9 deaths, but this was an earlier report.
• The claim about the investigation into the psychological test is not directly supported by any of the provided sources. However, it is a plausible and logical inference.