Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate, with the key claim about disability benefit changes affecting only future claimants being plausible based on the context provided by other sources. There is a slight bias towards framing the situation as a "deal" with Labour rebels, which might oversimplify the complexities of the negotiations and internal party dynamics.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Cuts to some disability benefits will only hit future claimants, not those already on it.
  • Verification Source #4: This source mentions "welfare changes, despite a growing rebellion from Labour backbench MPs," suggesting changes are being made to the welfare system.
  • Verification Source #5: This source mentions Welfare Secretary Liz Kendall trying to reassure Labour MPs about the changes.
• Analysis:* While none of the sources *explicitly* confirm that the cuts *only* affect future claimants, the context of reassuring MPs and facing a rebellion suggests concessions or modifications to the original plan. The claim is plausible given the context.
• Claim:** PM 'agrees' welfare changes deal with Labour rebels.
  • Verification Source #1: Mentions "PM considers welfare concessions in rebel MP talks."
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions "PM considers welfare cuts concessions in rebel MP talks."
  • Verification Source #3: Mentions "backbench rebellion threatening to kill his welfare reforms."
  • Verification Source #4: Mentions "growing rebellion from Labour backbench MPs."
• Analysis:* These sources confirm the existence of a rebellion and the PM considering concessions. The word "agrees" implies a finalized deal, which might be an overstatement, but the core idea of negotiation and potential agreement is supported.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** All sources agree on the existence of a Labour rebellion against welfare reforms and the PM's attempts to address it through concessions or negotiations. Verification Source #1, #2, #3, and #4 all support this.
• Lack of Coverage:** None of the sources explicitly confirm the specific detail that disability benefit cuts will *only* affect future claimants. This is a limitation in verifying this specific claim.
• Potential Bias:** The title uses the word "agrees," which might suggest a more definitive agreement than actually exists. The sources indicate ongoing negotiations and considerations of concessions, not necessarily a finalized deal. This suggests a slight bias towards portraying a resolution.