Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While it correctly identifies the initial "Megxit" event and Meghan's presence in Canada, the claim about the Queen giving royal staff "days" to find a solution is not directly supported by the provided sources. The claim of "uproar" is subjective and difficult to verify definitively, but the sources suggest significant public and royal family reaction. The article exhibits moderate bias through its framing of the situation as an "uproar" and a "royal rift," which could be interpreted as sensationalizing the event.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Prince Harry and Meghan's split from royals causes uproar in the U.K.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the claim of an "uproar" following the announcement to "step back."
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the fact that Harry and Meghan announced their decision to "step back."
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the idea that Harry and Meghan's actions caused issues within the royal family.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports the fact that Prince Harry is a member of the British Royal Family.
• Analysis:* The claim of "uproar" is supported by Verification Source #1 and #3.
• Claim:** Queen Elizabeth has given royal staff just days to come up with a workable solution to Prince Harry and Meghan's plans to step back.
• Analysis:* None of the provided sources explicitly state that Queen Elizabeth gave royal staff "just days" to come up with a solution. This claim is unverified by the provided sources.
• Claim:** Meghan is already in Canada, with eight-month-old Archie.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the claim that Meghan left the U.K. for Canada.
• Analysis:* The claim that Meghan was in Canada is supported by Verification Source #1. The claim about Archie's age is not directly verifiable from the provided sources. Internal knowledge suggests that Archie was approximately eight months old around the time of these events (early 2020), but this relies on external information not included in the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Verification Source #1 and #2 both confirm the announcement of Harry and Meghan's decision to "step back" from their roles.
• Agreement:** Verification Source #1 supports the claim that Meghan left the U.K. for Canada.
• Lack of Coverage:** The specific timeframe of "days" given to royal staff by the Queen is not covered by any of the provided sources.
• Lack of Coverage:** Archie's age is not explicitly mentioned in the provided sources.
• Contradiction:** Verification Source #4 discusses divorce rumors, which contradicts the initial claim of a "split from royals" as the primary focus of the article. However, this source is a Reddit post, which is not considered a reliable source for factual verification.