Analysis Summary:

The article's claim about strained relations between Ramaphosa and Trump is supported by multiple sources. However, the specific claim about the special envoy being rejected is not directly verified by the provided sources, making the accuracy mixed. The article exhibits a moderate bias by focusing on the negative aspects of the relationship.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** President Ramaphosa's special envoy has reportedly been rejected by the US, in the latest sign of frosty relations.
  • Verification Source #1: Does not cover the specific claim about a rejected special envoy, but mentions an attempt to "reset" relations, suggesting existing difficulties.
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions Trump meeting with Ramaphosa, suggesting an attempt to "mend fences," but does not confirm or deny the rejection of a special envoy.
  • Verification Source #3: Mentions Ramaphosa trying to "reset relations," indicating existing issues, but does not address the special envoy claim.
  • Verification Source #4: Mentions the need to "mend fences" with the US, supporting the idea of strained relations, but does not cover the special envoy.
  • Verification Source #5: Irrelevant to the claim.
  • Internal Knowledge:* Without additional sources, it's difficult to confirm the specific claim about the rejected envoy.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1, #3, and #4: All support the idea of "tricky relations" or the need to "mend fences" between South Africa and the US under Trump.
• Verification Source #2: Supports the idea of strained relations.
• None of the provided sources directly confirm or deny the claim about the rejected special envoy. This claim remains unverified.
• Verification Source #5: Irrelevant.