Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed, primarily because it presents an opinion from a retired general regarding the potential consequences of the Syria withdrawal. While the general's assessment is plausible, it's difficult to verify definitively without specific evidence. The article exhibits moderate bias by focusing on a viewpoint critical of the withdrawal, potentially omitting alternative perspectives.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** Retired General Raymond Thomas says Syria withdrawal gives ISIS a "great opportunity" to resurge.
• Verification Source: None. This is the central claim of the article.
• Analysis: This is an opinion/prediction. While plausible given the power vacuum a withdrawal could create, it's not a verifiable fact without further evidence. My internal knowledge suggests that the withdrawal of forces from conflict zones can indeed create opportunities for insurgent groups to regain strength. However, the extent of this opportunity is debatable.
• Claim 2:** The article implies that the general's opinion is significant due to his former position as commander of U.S. Special Operations Command.
• Verification Source: None. This is an implicit claim based on the article's introduction.
• Analysis: This is likely accurate. The former commander of U.S. Special Operations Command would possess significant knowledge and experience related to counter-terrorism operations and the situation in Syria. My internal knowledge confirms that such a position would grant the individual considerable expertise.
• Claim 3:** The article discusses White House strategy in Syria.
• Verification Source: None. The extent of this discussion is unknown from the snippet.
• Analysis: Without the full article, it's impossible to assess the accuracy of this claim. It's plausible that the interview touches on the White House strategy, but the depth and accuracy are unverifiable.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Due to the lack of external verification sources, I am relying on my internal knowledge. The claim that a withdrawal could create an opportunity for ISIS to resurge is plausible based on general understanding of conflict dynamics. However, without specific evidence related to the current situation in Syria and ISIS's capabilities, it's impossible to definitively verify or contradict the general's opinion.
• The article's focus on a critical viewpoint suggests a potential bias against the withdrawal strategy. Alternative perspectives, such as potential benefits of the withdrawal or counterarguments to the general's assessment, are not presented in the snippet.