Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, with the core claim about the lack of knighthoods for rugby league players over 130 years supported by multiple sources. However, the article exhibits a slight bias by focusing on the perceived injustice without presenting counter-arguments or alternative perspectives. Some claims are not directly verifiable with the provided sources, requiring reliance on internal knowledge.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Rugby league anger at no knighthoods in 130 years" - This is the central claim. Verification Source #1 and Verification Source #4 both support the claim that no rugby league player has received a knighthood in the sport's 130-year history.
• Claim:** "The Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle joins protests at the lack of knighthoods for rugby league players." - Verification Source #1 directly supports this claim, stating that "Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle has voiced his anger that no rugby league..."
• Claim:** (Implied) Rugby league is a sport worthy of knighthoods. This is an implied value judgment. While Verification Source #1 and Verification Source #4 highlight the lack of knighthoods, they don't explicitly state the sport's worthiness. This relies on the reader's understanding and acceptance of rugby league's significance.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Verification Source #1 and Verification Source #4 both confirm the 130-year period without a knighthood for rugby league players.
• Agreement:** Verification Source #1 confirms Lindsay Hoyle's involvement in protesting the lack of knighthoods.
• Lack of Coverage:** Verification Source #2, Verification Source #3, and Verification Source #5 are not relevant to the central claims of the article. They cover topics related to "A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms", rugby league legends, and the New Zealand national rugby union team, respectively.