Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is mixed. While the core claim about Russian officials receiving promotions after serving in a drone unit is plausible given the context of the war, it lacks direct verification from the provided sources. The article exhibits moderate bias through its framing and selective reporting, focusing on the perceived advantages afforded to officials compared to regular soldiers.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "After a stint with a drone unit led by a member of Parliament, Russian officials return to work, and promotions, garlanded as war veterans."
• Verification Status: This is the central claim of the article. None of the provided verification sources directly confirm or deny the existence of such a "V.I.P." brigade or the automatic promotion of officials after serving in it. The closest related source is Verification Source #5, which lists a "VIP list" from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), but this is a list of prominent persons whose military records files they hold, not a list of officials receiving preferential treatment in the military.
• Internal Knowledge: Without specific evidence, it's difficult to assess the accuracy of this claim. While it's plausible that officials might receive preferential treatment, the lack of direct verification lowers the factual accuracy score.
• Claim:** "Most soldiers are stuck in indefinite deployments."
• Verification Status: This claim is not directly addressed by any of the provided sources. While Verification Source #2 mentions the "full-scale war in Ukraine," it doesn't provide information about the deployment status of Russian soldiers.
• Internal Knowledge: Given the nature of the conflict, it's plausible that many soldiers face extended deployments. However, without specific evidence, this remains unverified.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Lack of Coverage:** The primary issue is the lack of direct coverage of the article's central claims by the provided verification sources.
• Plausibility:** While not directly supported, the claim about officials receiving promotions is plausible within the context of potential corruption or preferential treatment within the Russian system.
• Bias:** The article's framing suggests a negative view of the situation, highlighting the perceived unfairness of the system. This contributes to the moderate bias score.