Senate approves $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid, public media funding
Senate approves $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid, public media funding

The Senate passed President Trump’s request to rescind $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funding early Thursday and sent it back to the House ahead of a Friday deadline.
Read the full article on CBS Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article is mostly accurate. The core claim about the Senate passing the $9 billion rescissions package is supported by multiple sources. There's a slight slant in the title and opening, framing it as "President Trump's request," but the reporting itself is relatively neutral.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim 1:** "The Senate passed President Trump's request to rescind $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funding early Thursday..."
- Verification Source #1: Supports the $9 billion figure and the need for Congressional approval.
- Verification Source #2: Supports the $9 billion figure and the areas of funding affected.
- Verification Source #3: Supports the claim that it was Trump's request and the $9 billion figure.
- Verification Source #4: Supports the $9 billion figure and the areas of funding affected.
- Verification Source #5: Supports the claim that it was the Trump administration's request.
- Verdict: Supported by multiple sources.
- Claim 2:** "...and sent it back to the House ahead of a Friday deadline."
- Verification Source #1: Supports the Friday deadline.
- Verification Source #5: Supports the Friday deadline.
- Verdict: Supported by multiple sources.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Agreement: All sources agree that the Senate was considering a $9 billion rescissions package targeting foreign aid and public broadcasting. Verification Source #1, Verification Source #2, Verification Source #3, Verification Source #4, and Verification Source #5 all support this.
- Agreement: Verification Source #1 and Verification Source #5 both confirm the Friday deadline.
- Lack of Coverage: None of the sources contradict the claims made in the article.