Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. The claim about deaths near Pittsburgh is unverified, while the flash flooding claim is partially supported. The article exhibits a moderate bias through selective reporting and potentially sensationalized language.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "At least two people were killed near Pittsburgh, which was hit by some of the strongest winds ever recorded there." This claim is *not covered* by any of the provided verification sources. Without further information, it's impossible to verify the accuracy of this statement.
• Claim:** "Meanwhile, flash flooding has caused problems from north Texas to southwest Missouri." Verification Source #4 supports the claim of extreme rainfall and flooding in the central US, which includes parts of Texas and Missouri. However, it doesn't specifically mention "flash flooding" *nor* the specific regions of "north Texas to southwest Missouri." Therefore, this claim is partially supported.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Verification Source #4 confirms extreme rainfall and flooding in the central US.
• Lack of Coverage:** None of the provided sources cover the claim about deaths near Pittsburgh or the specific wind strength.
• Partial Support:** Verification Source #4 supports the general claim of flooding in the central US, but not the specific regions mentioned in the article.