Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is questionable. The claim about Mexico electing all its judges is contradicted by available sources. The article seems to focus on the controversial aspect of the candidate's past, potentially introducing bias through selective framing.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** "On Sunday, Mexico will become the first country to elect all its judges, following a major reform."
• Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: *Fail to cover* this claim. This statement requires further investigation beyond the provided sources. Internal knowledge suggests this claim is highly unlikely and contradicts the standard judicial selection processes in most countries. Therefore, I rate this as likely inaccurate.
• Claim 2:** The article implies a connection between the candidate and defending drug lord El Chapo.
• Verification Source #1: Mentions El Chapo in the context of cartel violence in Mexico.
• Verification Source #2: Mentions El Chapo as a drug lord.
• Verification Source #3: Mentions El Chapo's wife.
• Verification Source #5: Mentions El Chapo and his role in cartel violence.
• These sources confirm El Chapo's existence and notoriety as a drug lord, lending credibility to the claim that the candidate's association with him is a significant factor. However, the specific nature of the "defense" is not elaborated upon in the article or the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The claim about Mexico electing all its judges is not supported by any of the provided sources and contradicts general knowledge of judicial selection processes.
• Verification Source #1, #2, #3, and #5 support the existence and notoriety of El Chapo.
• The article's title and framing suggest a negative bias by highlighting the candidate's connection to a controversial figure.