Shooting in Jerusalem Leaves at Least 5 Dead
Shooting in Jerusalem Leaves at Least 5 Dead
The Israeli police described the incident as a terrorist attack and said that the perpetrators had been “neutralized” at the scene.
Read the full article on NY Times World
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article contains significant factual errors, primarily related to the date and casualty count. While the article describes the event as a terrorist attack, which aligns with some sources, the overall accuracy is low due to conflicting information regarding the date and number of deaths. The article exhibits moderate bias by using the term "neutralized" without providing further context.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: Shooting in Jerusalem leaves at least 5 dead
- Verification Source #1: Reports at least 7 dead in a Jerusalem synagogue attack on January 27, 2023.
- Verification Source #4: Reports at least 7 killed in a Jerusalem synagogue shooting on January 27, 2023.
- Assessment: Contradicted. Sources 1 and 4 report 7 deaths in a Jerusalem shooting in January 2023, not 5 deaths in September 2025 as the article suggests.
- Claim: The Israeli police described the incident as a terrorist attack
- Verification Source #1: Source 1 mentions a shooting near a synagogue in Jerusalem amid high tensions in Israel, implying a potential terroristic motive.
- Verification Source #3: Source 3 mentions a Palestinian gunman killed at least seven people and injured several more at a synagogue in Jerusalem's Neve Yaakov neighborhood, suggesting a terroristic motive.
- Assessment: Supported. While the sources don't explicitly state "terrorist attack", the context of a shooting at a synagogue with multiple casualties suggests a terroristic motive, aligning with the article's claim.
- Claim: The perpetrators had been “neutralized” at the scene.
- Verification Source #1: Source 1 does not mention the term "neutralized."
- Verification Source #3: Source 3 mentions a Palestinian gunman being killed, which could be interpreted as "neutralized."
- Assessment: Potentially supported, but requires careful interpretation. Source 3 mentions the gunman being killed, which could be considered "neutralized". The term itself can be considered biased.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Source 1 and 4 contradict the article's claim of a shooting in September 2025 with 5 deaths, reporting a shooting in January 2023 with 7 deaths.
- The use of the term "neutralized" by the NY Times can be seen as biased language.