Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate, highlighting the threat of rising temperatures to crops and the potential of genetic alteration as a solution. The article touches on funding and social acceptance challenges, which are plausible but lack direct verification from the provided sources. There's a slight bias towards promoting genetic alteration as a solution, without deeply exploring potential drawbacks.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Soaring Temperatures Threaten Crops.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, stating that changes in temperature could have significant impacts on crop yields.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports this claim, indicating that climate change impact on crops is expected within 10 years due to temperature increases.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports this claim, citing rising temperatures disrupting cacao crops in West Africa.
• Claim:** Scientists Are Looking to Alter the Plants.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim, mentioning that genome editing could be used to make crops resistant to extreme heat.
• Claim:** Genetically altering crops may be key to helping them adapt to extreme temperatures.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim, suggesting genome editing for heat resistance.
• Claim:** But shrinking funds and social acceptance stand in the way.
• Fail to cover:* None of the provided sources directly address the specific issues of shrinking funds and social acceptance related to genetically altered crops. This is plausible, but unverified by the provided sources. Internal knowledge suggests that funding for agricultural research can be volatile and public acceptance of GMOs varies widely.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Multiple sources (Verification Source #1, #4, #5) agree that rising temperatures pose a threat to crops.
• Agreement:** Verification Source #3 supports the idea of using genetic modification to make crops more resilient to climate change.
• Lack of Coverage:** None of the provided sources address the specific claims about "shrinking funds" and "social acceptance" hindering the development and implementation of genetically altered crops.