Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. The claim about repairing relations with backbenchers over welfare cuts is partially supported, but the broader context requires more information. There's a moderate bias due to the limited scope and potential for selective reporting.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Starmer changes tone in bid to win back Labour MPs" - This is a general statement and difficult to verify directly without more specifics. The Reddit post (Verification Source #1) suggests a change in perception of Starmer, but doesn't directly confirm a change in tone specifically aimed at winning back MPs.
• Claim:** "The prime minster and his team are trying to repair relations with backbenchers over welfare cuts." - This claim is partially supported by Verification Source #2, which mentions Labour MPs mounting a bid to block benefits changes. This implies tension and a need for repair. However, the article snippet incorrectly refers to "the prime minister," which is a factual error. It should refer to Keir Starmer and the Labour leadership.
• The other sources (Verification Source #3, #4, and #5) do not directly address the specific claim about repairing relations with backbenchers over welfare cuts. They focus on Starmer's leadership bid, internal party reforms, and general political commentary.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Verification Source #2 supports the idea of tension between Labour leadership and MPs regarding welfare changes, suggesting a need to "repair relations."
• Contradiction:** The article snippet incorrectly refers to "the prime minister," which is a factual error. Keir Starmer is the leader of the Labour party, not the prime minister.
• Lack of Coverage:** Verification Source #1, #3, #4, and #5 do not directly address the specific claim about repairing relations with backbenchers over welfare cuts.
• Internal Knowledge:** It is common knowledge that the Prime Minister is the leader of the ruling party, which is currently the Conservative Party, not the Labour Party. Therefore, the article snippet's reference to "the prime minister" is factually incorrect in this context.