Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the provided sources. The core claim that Starmer condemned the fires is supported, although the specific phrase "attack on democracy" is not directly confirmed. The article seems relatively neutral, presenting a straightforward report of the event.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Starmer condemns fires.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, and #5 mention Keir Starmer condemning "far-right thuggery" or actions. This supports the general claim that Starmer condemned something related to unrest.
• Claim:** Starmer condemns fires as 'attack on democracy'.
• While Verification Source #1 mentions "attack against democracy in the US," it does not directly attribute the phrase "attack on democracy" to Starmer regarding the fires. The other sources do not cover this specific phrasing. This is a minor discrepancy.
• Claim:** Political leaders offer their support to the PM amid investigation into suspected arson attacks on properties linked to him.
• The sources do not directly confirm that political leaders offered support to the PM specifically related to arson attacks on properties. However, the general context of condemnation from political leaders (Verification Source #1, #2) suggests this is plausible.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1 and #2 both confirm that Keir Starmer condemned something, although the exact wording differs slightly ("far-right thuggery").
• Verification Source #5 provides a general news context, mentioning Keir Starmer in relation to other events.
• The provided sources do not explicitly confirm the "attack on democracy" quote or the specific support offered to the PM regarding arson attacks. This does not necessarily mean the claims are false, but rather that they are unverified by the provided sources.