State emergency officials say new rules and delays for FEMA grants put disaster response at risk
State emergency officials say new rules and delays for FEMA grants put disaster response at risk
State emergency management officials say they’re facing funding challenges from the federal government that threaten the country’s ability to respond to crises
Read the full article on ABC US
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article presents a claim about FEMA grant rules and delays impacting disaster response. While the general premise aligns with some documented concerns about FEMA funding and bureaucratic processes, the article lacks specific details and relies on potentially biased sources (state emergency officials). Therefore, the accuracy is mixed, and the bias is moderate due to the one-sided perspective.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: State emergency management officials say they're facing funding challenges from the federal government.
- Verification Source #4: The OIG report from 2018 indicates that both FEMA and State officials have experienced difficulties obtaining grant funding.
- Assessment: Supported. Source 4 confirms that state officials have experienced difficulties obtaining grant funding.
- Claim: New rules and delays for FEMA grants put disaster response at risk.
- Verification Source #1: The National Response Framework outlines how the nation responds to disasters, implying that funding challenges could impact this framework.
- Verification Source #5: The National Disaster Recovery Framework outlines how the nation recovers from disasters, implying that funding challenges could impact this framework.
- Assessment: Unverified. While the National Response and Recovery Frameworks (sources 1 and 5) highlight the importance of disaster response, they don't directly address whether new rules and delays specifically put it at risk. Source 4 suggests potential issues with funding, but doesn't confirm the 'new rules' aspect.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Source 4: 'Both FEMA and State officials said they experienced similar difficulties obtaining grant funding at risk of being deobligated or not funded.'