Steven Cook, a Former Chemical Industry Lawyer, Now at E.P.A., Wants to Change PFAS Rules
Steven Cook, a Former Chemical Industry Lawyer, Now at E.P.A., Wants to Change PFAS Rules
A Trump appointee has proposed rewriting a measure that requires companies to clean up “forever chemicals,” documents show. The new version would shift costs from polluters.
Read the full article on NY Times World
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article presents a claim about a Trump appointee altering PFAS cleanup rules to shift costs from polluters. While PFAS regulations are a real issue, the claim is difficult to verify directly with the provided sources, and the framing suggests a bias against the appointee. The article relies on an unnamed source ('documents show') which weakens the factual basis.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: A Trump appointee has proposed rewriting a measure that requires companies to clean up “forever chemicals.”
- Verification Source #1: Source 1 provides background information on PFAS, describing them as a group of fluorinated compounds used for various purposes. It does not mention specific appointees or rule changes.
- Verification Source #2: Source 2 discusses EPA's actions regarding PFAS, including the final rule and multi-industry study. It does not mention specific appointees or proposed rewrites of existing measures.
- Assessment: Unverified. While the sources confirm the existence of PFAS regulations and EPA involvement, they do not corroborate the claim about a specific Trump appointee proposing to rewrite cleanup measures.
- Claim: The new version would shift costs from polluters.
- Verification Source #1: Source 1 does not address the economic impact or cost allocation of PFAS cleanup.
- Verification Source #2: Source 2 does not address the economic impact or cost allocation of PFAS cleanup.
- Assessment: Unverified. The provided sources do not offer information to support or refute this claim.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- The article relies on 'documents show' without providing further details or access to these documents, making independent verification impossible with the provided sources.
- The provided sources confirm the existence of PFAS regulations and EPA involvement, but do not corroborate the specific claims about a Trump appointee and cost shifting.