Analysis Summary:

The article's claim about Trump's tariffs disrupting global trade is supported, but the assertion that they haven't resulted in major concessions from Beijing is more nuanced and lacks direct verification. The article exhibits moderate bias through framing and potentially selective reporting. The future date (2025) in the URL suggests this is a hypothetical scenario, which impacts the assessment of factual accuracy.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** President Trump’s triple-digit tariffs on Chinese products disrupted global trade.
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions Trump's 2018-2019 trade war with China involved tariffs, suggesting a disruption.
  • Verification Source #4: Refers to "Trump's tariff wars," implying a significant impact.
• Status:* Supported.
• Claim:** ...but haven’t appeared to result in major concessions from Beijing.
• This claim is difficult to verify definitively with the provided sources. While Verification Source #1 mentions Chinese consumers potentially getting hurt, it doesn't directly address whether major concessions were made.
• Status:* Unverified. This is a complex issue that requires more specific evidence about the outcomes of trade negotiations.
• General Note:** The URL indicates the article is from 2025, making it a hypothetical scenario. This impacts the assessment of factual accuracy, as it's projecting into the future.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #2 and #4 support the claim that Trump implemented tariffs on China, contributing to a trade war.
• Verification Source #1 hints at the negative impact on Chinese consumers, but doesn't directly address the outcome of trade negotiations or whether "major concessions" were made.
• The lack of direct evidence regarding "major concessions" makes it difficult to fully assess the accuracy of that claim.
• The future date in the URL is a significant limitation, as it indicates a hypothetical scenario.