Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While the general premise about universities relying on international students seems plausible, the provided sources don't directly verify the specific claims about which universities are *most* dependent or the political implications suggested. The article exhibits moderate bias by framing international student enrollment as a "vulnerability," potentially reflecting a specific viewpoint on the issue.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** "What was once a sign of international renown now looks like a vulnerability."
• Verification Source #3: Supports the general idea that international students contribute significantly to the U.S. economy, implying their presence was once viewed positively. However, it *fails to cover* whether this is now seen as a "vulnerability."
• Internal Knowledge:* It is plausible that some institutions might view reliance on international students as a vulnerability, especially given potential fluctuations in international relations or visa policies. However, this is not directly verifiable from the provided sources.
• Claim 2:** (Implied) Some U.S. universities are highly dependent on international students.
• Verification Source #1: Shows that the University of Central Florida has a significant number of international students (over 3,400), supporting the idea that some universities have a substantial international student population.
• Verification Source #3: States that there are 1.1 million international students in the U.S., further supporting the idea that many universities host international students.
• Internal Knowledge:* It is reasonable to assume that some universities are more dependent on international student tuition revenue than others, but the provided sources do not offer specific rankings or data to confirm which universities are *most* dependent.
• Claim 3:** (Implied) The political climate (e.g., "Trump") affects international student enrollment.
• Verification Source #2: Mentions frequently asked questions about the international student process, suggesting that the process is subject to regulations and policies that could be influenced by political factors. However, it *fails to cover* the direct impact of specific political figures or administrations.
• Internal Knowledge:* Changes in visa policies or political rhetoric could potentially influence international student enrollment, but this is not directly verifiable from the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: Provides evidence that UCF has a large international student population, supporting the general idea that universities host international students.
• Verification Source #3: Shows the significant economic contribution of international students, suggesting their importance to the U.S. economy and, by extension, universities.
• The provided sources *fail to cover* the specific universities that are "most dependent" on international students, nor do they directly link political figures or administrations to changes in international student enrollment. This lack of coverage limits the factual accuracy score.
• The framing of international student enrollment as a "vulnerability" without further context or supporting data suggests a potential bias.