Thousands in Norway Mistakenly Told of Lottery Winnings
Thousands in Norway Mistakenly Told of Lottery Winnings

A state-owned gambling company apologized after telling players they had won “erroneously high prizes.” It blamed the error on a faulty currency conversion.
Read the full article on NY Times World
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The NY Times article appears mostly accurate. The core claim about a lottery error in Norway is supported by multiple sources. The article is concise and presents the information in a neutral manner.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim:** Thousands in Norway Mistakenly Told of Lottery Winnings.
- Verification Source #1, #2, #4, and #5 all support this claim.
- Claim:** A state-owned gambling company apologized.
- Verification Source #2 mentions "state-owned gambling operator, Norsk". Verification Source #1 refers to "Norsk Tipping". This supports the claim that a state-owned gambling company was involved and implicitly apologized.
- Claim:** Players were told they had won “erroneously high prizes.”
- Verification Source #1 states "Thousands of Norwegians mistakenly told they won millions in lottery". Verification Source #2 states "Thousands in Norway told they had won life-changing sums in lottery error". Verification Source #4 and #5 state "Thousands of lottery players in Norway were mistakenly told last week that they had won more money than they actually did." These support the claim.
- Claim:** It blamed the error on a faulty currency conversion.
- Verification Source #1 states "The mistake stemmed from an error when winnings in Euros — which the company receives from Germany — were converted to Norwegian kroner". This supports the claim.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Verification Source #1, #2, #4, and #5 all agree that thousands of people in Norway were mistakenly told they had won lottery prizes.
- Verification Source #1 provides the specific reason for the error: a faulty currency conversion from Euros to Norwegian Kroner.
- Verification Source #3, a Reddit post, is not a reliable source for verification. It offers commentary but does not provide factual information about the event itself.
- There are no contradictions between the reliable sources.