Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate. The core claim about the strike involving approximately 3,000 union members at Pratt & Whitney in Connecticut is supported by multiple sources. The article appears to be relatively neutral, presenting the information in a straightforward manner.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** About 3,000 labor union members have gone on strike at jet engine maker Pratt & Whitney in Connecticut.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that machinists at CT-based Pratt & Whitney voted to go on strike.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports the claim that a strike is underway at Pratt & Whitney in CT.
  • Verification Source #1: *Fails to cover* the specific number of striking members or the strike itself, but mentions union activity related to Pratt & Whitney.
  • Verification Source #4: Mentions thousands of IAM members at Pratt & Whitney in Connecticut.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the claim that machinists at Pratt & Whitney have the option to strike.
• Claim:** Negotiations over wages, retirement benefits and job security broke down.
• This claim is not directly verified by the provided sources, but is a common reason for strikes and is plausible. *Internal knowledge suggests this is a typical reason for union strikes, but without direct verification, this remains unconfirmed.*

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #2 and #5 confirm the strike is happening.
• Verification Source #4 indicates that thousands of union members are employed at Pratt & Whitney in Connecticut, supporting the plausibility of the 3,000 striking members claim.
• Verification Source #3 confirms the possibility of a strike due to failed contract talks.
• The specific reasons for the strike (wages, retirement benefits, job security) are not explicitly confirmed by the provided sources, but are plausible and consistent with common labor disputes.