Timeline: The Blaze Bernstein murder case

Timeline: The Blaze Bernstein murder case

A look at the 2018 disappearance of Blaze Bernstein and the evidence that led to Sam Woodward’s arrest and conviction in the hate crime murder.

Truth Analysis

Factual Accuracy
4/5
Bias Level
4/5

Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate, with key claims supported by multiple sources. The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting the timeline of events without significant bias. Minor claims are not always verifiable within the provided sources.

Detailed Analysis:

  • Claim: "A look at the 2018 disappearance of Blaze Bernstein and the evidence that led to Sam Woodward's arrest and conviction in the hate crime murder."
    • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, as it is the same article.
    • Verification Source #2: Supports the "hate crime" aspect.
    • Verification Source #3: Confirms the 2018 disappearance and murder.
  • Claim: Blaze Bernstein was a 19-year-old University of Pennsylvania sophomore.
    • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim.
  • Claim: Blaze Bernstein was killed after leaving home to meet an acquaintance at a park.
    • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim.
  • Claim: Samuel Lincoln Woodward was charged with a hate crime.
    • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim.
  • Claim: Samuel Woodward testified about reconnecting with Blaze Bernstein.
    • Verification Source #5: Supports this claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

  • Verification Source #1, #2, and #3 all corroborate the basic facts of the case, including the victim's name, the year of the murder, and the suspect's name.
  • Verification Source #2 specifically mentions the hate crime enhancement.
  • Verification Source #3 provides details about Blaze Bernstein's age and university affiliation.
  • Verification Source #5 confirms that Samuel Woodward testified about reconnecting with Blaze Bernstein.
  • Verification Source #4 provides information about Blaze Bernstein's final texts.
  • There are no significant contradictions between the sources.