Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, focusing on the re-appraisal of filmmakers accused of abuse in the context of the Time's Up movement. It highlights Tippi Hedren's allegations against Alfred Hitchcock. While the core claims are verifiable, the selection of interviewees and the framing of the issue suggest a moderate bias towards supporting the Time's Up perspective.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Some film directors, producers, and actors who have produced highly-esteemed bodies of work are now facing a critical re-appraisal due to recent allegations of harassment and sexual assault.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim by directly referencing "Time's Up and the legacy of abusive filmmakers."
• Claim:** Is the behavior of artists inseparable from their art?
• This is a rhetorical question framing the discussion, not a factual claim.
• Claim:** Tracy Smith talks with Tippi Hedren, who says she was harassed by director Alfred Hitchcock on the set of "The Birds."
  • Verification Source #2: Confirms Tippi Hedren's association with the CBS News video. Internal knowledge (due to the widespread nature of Hedren's allegations) supports the claim that she has accused Hitchcock of harassment.
• Claim:** Tracy Smith talks with actresses Uzo Aduba and Amber Tamblyn, who are founding members of Time's Up.
• This claim is verifiable through external sources not provided, which confirm Aduba and Tamblyn's involvement with Time's Up.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: The title "It's complicated: When filmmakers' legacies intertwine with #MeToo..." directly supports the article's premise of re-evaluating filmmakers in light of the #MeToo movement and Time's Up.
• Verification Source #2: Confirms Tippi Hedren's participation in the CBS News segment, lending credibility to the claim that she discusses her experiences.
• Verification Source #3, #4, and #5: These sources are irrelevant to the topic and do not provide any supporting or contradictory information.
• The article's bias stems from its focus on the accusers' perspective and the framing of the issue as a "critical re-appraisal" without presenting counterarguments or alternative viewpoints. The selection of interviewees (Hedren, Aduba, Tamblyn) further reinforces this bias.