Analysis Summary:

The article's claim of friction within the Trump administration's Justice Department antitrust team is plausible but lacks specific, verifiable details within the provided sources. The sources touch on antitrust enforcement during the Trump administration but do not directly confirm or deny internal friction. Therefore, the accuracy is mixed, and a moderate bias is suspected due to the reliance on unnamed sources and the potential for selective reporting.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Friction within the Trump administration has cropped up with the Justice Department team that fights monopolies, sources tell CBS News."
  • Verification Source #1: Fails to cover this specific claim about internal friction within the Trump administration. It discusses antitrust enforcement during the Obama administration.
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions high-tech antitrust enforcement during the Trump administration but doesn't address internal friction.
  • Verification Source #3: Discusses a DOJ official issuing an antitrust warning but doesn't mention internal friction.
  • Verification Source #4: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #5: Discusses the Trump administration's efforts regarding antitrust with South Korea but doesn't address internal friction.
• Analysis: The claim relies on unnamed sources, making it difficult to verify with the provided sources. While the sources confirm antitrust activity during the Trump administration, they neither confirm nor deny the existence of internal friction.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not directly support or contradict the claim of internal friction within the Trump administration's Justice Department antitrust team.
• Verification Source #2: Supports the general idea of high-tech antitrust enforcement being a priority during the Trump administration.
• Verification Source #5: Supports the idea of the Trump administration pushing for antitrust measures internationally.
• The lack of specific details and reliance on unnamed sources in the CBS News article raises concerns about potential bias or selective reporting.