Trump Administration Fights Roadblock to Pursuing Comey Case
Trump Administration Fights Roadblock to Pursuing Comey Case
The battle preceded the department’s looming decision over whether — and how — to bring new charges against James B. Comey.
Read the full article on NY Times Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article's central claim about the Trump administration pursuing charges against James Comey faces significant contradictions from the provided sources, suggesting factual inaccuracies. While the article appears to report on a legal matter, the selective focus and framing indicate a moderate bias.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: The Trump administration is facing a roadblock in pursuing a case against James B. Comey.
- Verification Source #1: Reports that Erik S. Siebert hit roadblocks investigating James B. Comey.
- Verification Source #3: Suggests a 'retribution case' against James Comey.
- Verification Source #5: States that the DOJ faces an uphill battle in prosecuting Trump adversaries, including James Comey, after cases were dismissed.
- Assessment: Partially supported, but also contradicted. While some sources mention roadblocks and difficulties, others suggest the pursuit of a case. The degree of the 'roadblock' is unclear and potentially overstated.
- Claim: The Department of Justice is nearing a decision on whether to bring new charges against James B. Comey.
- Verification Source #5: The DOJ faces an uphill battle in prosecuting Trump adversaries after cases were dismissed.
- Assessment: Potentially accurate, but lacks strong verification. Source 5 implies the possibility of prosecution, but also highlights the difficulties.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Source 5: 'DOJ faces uphill battle after James Comey, Letitia James cases...' suggests difficulties in prosecuting Comey.
- Source 1: 'Erik S. Siebert had hit roadblocks investigating... James B. Comey' supports the idea of obstacles in pursuing a case.